BCS standings

9 replies · 2226 views · Started by atlprincess · Nov 2004

College Park, GA

atlprincess College Park, GA

Right now, USC is #1, Oklahoma is #2, and Auburn is #3. I personally feel that Auburn should be ranked higher...I mean they are in the **** which is one of the most difficult conferences to be in. What do ya'll think? Should they be higher or stay right where they are?

Page 1 of 1 1

MidWestGentleman from Detroit, MI · Nov 2004

#1 Reply

i think u are biased and u know why :lol: .but theyre not gonna get ranked higher unless USC or OK loses.auburn still has a tough game to play against tennessee so who knows what could happen.but num3 is as close as they will get.USC and OK are jus that good.i personally dont like the BCS like many people.it should be a playoff with all the undefeated teams to determine the national champ.

Report

Quote

atlprincess from College Park, GA · Nov 2004

#2 Reply

Lol...ssssssh! No, but seriously look at the teams Auburn plays. We were talking about it in class today and I just feel like Auburn should be higher. **Shouts out to #27** LOL

Report

Quote

· Nov 2004

#3 Reply

TuskegeeSooner wrote:
1. Oklahoma and USC have been in the Top 5 for years...has Auburn no?....n0 n00bies 2. Damn Auburn is good....but Auburn has a Strength of Schedule of friggin 91st in the nation...Look @ their out of conference schedule 3. OU has more quality wins(beat more teams with a winning record) and has a higher SOS than USC Auburn combined 4. THANK THE FRIGGIN GOD OU ATHLETIC DIRECTOR CANCELED THE GAME WITH FAMU...would have hurt OU's SOS like The Citadel,LA Monroe and LA Tech did to Auburn :wink: 5. OU is pulling away from Auburn and OU has #1 in Computer polls...OU rolls to Miami after the Stomp on Iowa State in the Big XII Championship game

Whoa now...haven't you learned that you NEVER just blow off ANY team in college football? I mean, it isn't like Iowa State never won a game this year. As a matter of fact, they're 6-4 at the moment. As much of an Alabama fan as I am, I'm gonna take up for Auburn on this one. Contrary to ignorant belief, the **** is THE most difficult league to play football in. It always has been, and it probably always will be. Case in point: The Iron Bowl. Alabama has sucked **** all year long, mainly due to injuries of starting players on offense. Can you guess who came pretty close to upsetting Auburn this year?? Roll Tide. I mean, really. Even Kentucky & Vanderbilt aren't to be taken likely anymore. Look how Mississippi State beat Florida...look at how the **** has 5 (yes..a handful) of Top 25 ranked teams. I'll put the **** up against a Big XII team anyday. Moral of the story is...never count out any opponent. Thats how they went home with their heads in the hands(or ****) last year when Kansas State made them feel like fools.

Edit Delete Report

Quote

AggieWarrior from Charlotte, NC · Nov 2004

#4 Reply

atlprincess wrote:
Right now, USC is #1, Oklahoma is #2, and Auburn is #3. I personally feel that Auburn should be ranked higher...I mean they are in the **** which is one of the most difficult conferences to be in. What do ya'll think? Should they be higher or stay right where they are?

Auburn should be #2... but OU has the better SOS... and they have earned the right.... but even though that OU pretty much will run the table, don't count out any other team... everyone picked them in 2003 over K-State and K-State rolled right over them in the title game... but as long as Utah doesn't get cheated, i'll be cool w/ the BCS