shy*ebony*queen wrote: ok
look to everyone who read my whatever you want to call it i apologize and uh Laidback what ever i am from US but sometimes when you write you feel like shorthanding things and sometimes you just want to go all out but i apologize to all who took your time to read my things and uh yeah just whatever thank you all anyway though
I hope you do not speak the way you type, cuz your explanation is STILL incomprehensible.
laidbackfella wrote: taste_like_candie wrote: Umm...why do i still feel confused?! SO WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF BOTH OF THESE THREADS? Thats all i wanna know? Geesh, let me leave here...my head is startin to hurt!
*leaves out scratchin head*
She's a prime candidate fora new book, "Message Board Replies for Dummies"
Evidently she does not like to enter a response more than once in a thread.
I wouldn't respond either if I was tryin to be nice and nobody else had anything nice to say back.
stillfly87 wrote: laidbackfella wrote: taste_like_candie wrote: Umm...why do i still feel confused?! SO WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF BOTH OF THESE THREADS? Thats all i wanna know? Geesh, let me leave here...my head is startin to hurt!
*leaves out scratchin head*
She's a prime candidate fora new book, "Message Board Replies for Dummies"
Evidently she does not like to enter a response more than once in a thread.
I wouldn't respond either if I was tryin to be nice and nobody else had anything nice to say back.
:?
How logical is that statement, given the fact that she responded to a question asked in a previous thread in a new thread?
She responded, just not in the same thread.
laidbackfella wrote: stillfly87 wrote: laidbackfella wrote: taste_like_candie wrote: Umm...why do i still feel confused?! SO WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF BOTH OF THESE THREADS? Thats all i wanna know? Geesh, let me leave here...my head is startin to hurt!
*leaves out scratchin head*
She's a prime candidate fora new book, "Message Board Replies for Dummies"
Evidently she does not like to enter a response more than once in a thread.
I wouldn't respond either if I was tryin to be nice and nobody else had anything nice to say back.
:?
How logical is that statement, given the fact that she responded to a question asked in a previous thread in a new thread?
She responded, just not in the same thread.
*PURE*Kindnezz wrote: laidbackfella wrote: stillfly87 wrote: laidbackfella wrote: taste_like_candie wrote: Umm...why do i still feel confused?! SO WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF BOTH OF THESE THREADS? Thats all i wanna know? Geesh, let me leave here...my head is startin to hurt!
*leaves out scratchin head*
She's a prime candidate fora new book, "Message Board Replies for Dummies"
Evidently she does not like to enter a response more than once in a thread.
I wouldn't respond either if I was tryin to be nice and nobody else had anything nice to say back.
:?
How logical is that statement, given the fact that she responded to a question asked in a previous thread in a new thread?
She responded, just not in the same thread.