The Bible!

MidWestGentleman wrote:

Echoes of Thunder wrote:

*edited a buncha philosophical crap Anyways, to Midwest, I never assumed. I said this, I could go on and on about Buddhism, but what if you know very little about it, and that presents me almost no room to hypothesize something that you would understand. After I have repeatedly said I do not assume anything during a debate, you go on to make some ridiculous statement that I assumed something. If your going to come at me like that, then you'd better be damn sure your 100% under every single circumstance. I stated that you MIGHT NOT know very much about it, that's far from saying you DON'T know very much about it. But since you stated you know a little bit about Buhhdism, let's test what "little bit" means: What was the Nara belief similiar with amongst the Judaism branch and how did it differ directly from Mahayana, even though their treatises often taught similiar beliefs? This is not a hard question at all. But...it can't be googled . Why not make it an open question? If anyone can answer that, then I will go put other religions on blast. Thunder

ummm when i said i knew a lil bit thats EXACTLY what i meant.whats your point. a "little bit" means you know some general things but you dont know the in depth things about it.